| Structure
and Relevance |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
| Good organisation
and planning |
|
|
|
|
|
Poor organisation
and planning |
| Comprehensive
treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
Superficial treatment |
| Material clearly
relevant |
|
|
|
|
|
Much irrelevant
material |
| Content and
Argument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Coherent introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
Weak introduction |
| Valid key issues |
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptive approach |
| Clear definition
of terms |
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions unclear |
| Arguments developed
logically |
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of logical
argument |
| Arguments backed
by evidence |
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence inaccurate
or absent |
| Critical evaluation
of subject |
|
|
|
|
|
Uncritical evaluation
of subject |
| Independent approach |
|
|
|
|
|
Little originality |
| Balanced objective
approach |
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective biased
approach |
| Coherent conclusion |
|
|
|
|
|
Weak conclusion |
| Sources
and Their Use |
| Adequate acknowledgement
of sources |
|
|
|
|
|
Inadequate acknowledgement
of sources |
| Effective use
of figures/tables (where appropriate) |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
use of figures/tables |
| Correct presentation
of references |
|
|
|
|
|
Correct presentation
of references |
| General
Comments |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Signed: |
Mark/Grade: |